Research

I love doing simulations because they offer a powerful playground for exploring complex physical and chemical problems. In particular, I use computational tools and theoretical models to investigate chemical reactions and emergent phenomena including those result from strong light–matter interactions.

The figure that chatGPT generated according to the paragraph above. Obviously it is not familiar with Schrödinger equation and Maxwell's equations.

Many of these emerging phenomena involve nonadiabatic dynamics, where the electrons are strongly coupled with the nuclei (breaking down the Born–Oppenheimer approximation); or the matters are strongly coupled with the optical fields (requiring a quantum treatment of the field via second quantization). To address these challenges in a computationally efficient way, I focus on mixed quantum–classical methods as an alternative to fully quantum mechanical simulations.

Some of the broad research questions that guide my work include:

  • How accurately can classical mechanics capture quantum features and observables?
  • Can we develop more efficient and accurate methods for modeling nonadiabatic dynamics?
  • How can we combine theory with experimental data (e.g., spectra) to understand nonadiabatic processes in realistic, complex environments?
  • Can we design or control nonadiabatic phenomena based on the theoretical insights we gain?

The following projects reflect my efforts in tackling aspects of these questions. While they may not fully (or even partially) answer them, each project addresses its own research question as well.

Strong light–matter interactions

Strong light–matter interactions have been shown to manipulate and engineer the physical and chemical properties of molecules and materials, but the underlying mechanisms are still not well understood. Within a weak coupling regime, people typically used steady classical light to couple with the matter and focus on the matter part. However, a classical description of light cannot capture quantum phenomena such as spontaneous emission, which arises from vacuum fluctuations, as well as the quantitative agreement with quantum exact results when the photon quantum number is small or the light–matter interactions are strong.

To address this, a quantum discription of optical field (incorporating quantum electrodynamics), although computationally expensive, are neccessary. To balance accuracy and efficiency, we exlpoited existing nonadiabatic dynamics models in the theoretical chemistry community and modified the Ehrenfest (mean-field) model to include some of the quantum characters of optical field. This model is named Decoupled Mean-field (DC-MF) model.

Decoupled Mean-Field (DC-MF) model:
an efficient and accurate model for strong light–matter interactions

The key idea behind the DC-MF model is to separate the optical field into vacuum and thermal fluctuations, and to decouple the vacuum flucuations from the ground state.1 We came up with this “decoupling scheme” in order to address the issue of the standard Ehrenfest dynamics that results in unphysical energy transfer from zero-temperature vacuum fluctuations to the ground-state emitter (a zero-point energy leakage of the optical field). Beyond resolving this issue, our model also yields significant improvement in accuracy and good alignment with exact quantum reference.

We also invoked so-called focused sampling to initiate the vacuum fluctuations (only sampled phase-space variables that give zero-point energy) instead of the commonly used Wigner sampling. This not only reduces the number of required trajectories but also extends the applicability of the DC-MF model to a wider range of optical cavity lengths (manuscript in preparation).

The great computational scalability renders the DC-MF model applicable and feasible for various strong light–matter phenomena. We are currently integrating DC-MF with finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method, a prevalent method for simulating lights, to study complex light-matter interactions in realistic nanophotonic environments.

Left: idea of DC-MF.1 Right: great agreement between DC-MF and exact quantum reference (CISD).1

Mixed quantum–calssical dynamics yields anharmonic Rabi oscillations

We analytically derived a differential equation governing mixed quantum–classical dynamics for the Rabi problem.2 We showed that the resulting dynamics are described by an unforced and undamped Duffing equation, yielding anharmonic osciilations. Furthermore, we demonstrate that to reproduce the quantum results, the classical optical field needs to be initialized in around but slightly above the zero-point energy. This work provides guidance in the application of mixed quantum–classical dynamics to classes of problems involving small quantum numbers.

The dynamics governed by Duffing equation, yielding anharmonic oscillations.2

Radical mechanisms of Breslow intermediates in NHC-catalyzed reactions

Breslow intermediates play a crucial role in N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC)-catalyzed reactions, such as benzoin condensation, Stetter reaction, and vitamin B1-catalyzed reactions. While these reactions have traditionally been proposed to proceed via non-radical pathways, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) experiments have shown the presence of radical intermediates. To investigate this, we employed density functional theory (DFT), high-level ab initio methods, and multiconfigurational approaches to study the radical mechanisms.

We found that the enolate form of Breslow intermediates can form radicals through electron removal from a metastable dipole-bound state of the enolate form of Breslow intermediates,3 In the case of benzoin condensation, the hydrogen atom transfer mechanism has a high energy barrier, but the resulting radical may play a role to eliminate the side products.4 These findings align with experimental findings.

We also explored the radical mechanism in the fragmentation and rearrangement of Breslow intermediates and showed that radical and ionic fragmentation pathways can coexist. The dominant pathway depends on the chemical structures and the protonation states of Breslow intermeidates.5

Left: dipole-bound orbital of a Breslow intermediate.3 Middle: energy surfaces of singlet, dipole-bound, and doublet states.3 Right: Hydrogen-atom transfer pathway for generating radicals.4

References

  1. jpcl2023.jpeg
    A Mean-Field Treatment of Vacuum Fluctuations in Strong Light–Matter Coupling
    Ming-Hsiu Hsieh, Alex Krotz, and Roel Tempelaar
    J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2023, 14, 1253–1258
  2. jcp2025.jpg
    Mixed quantum–classical dynamics yields anharmonic Rabi oscillations
    Ming-Hsiu Hsieh and Roel Tempelaar
    J. Chem. Phys. 2025, 162, 224109
  3. jccs2021.jpg
    Dipole-Bound States and Substituent Effects of Breslow Intermediates in the Enolate Form
    Ming-Hsiu Hsieh, Gou-Tao Huang, and Jen-Shiang K. Yu
    J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 2021, 68, 2060–2070
  4. joc2018.jpeg
    Can the Radical Channel Contribute to the Catalytic Cycle of N-Heterocyclic Carbene in Benzoin Condensation?
    Ming-Hsiu Hsieh, Gou-Tao Huang, and Jen-Shiang K. Yu
    J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 15202–15209
  5. pccp2021.png
    Fragmentation and Rearrangement of Breslow Intermediates: Branches to Both Radical and Ionic Pathways
    Ming-Hsiu Hsieh and Jen-Shiang K. Yu
    Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021, 23, 27377–27384